Legal Opinion
Keil v. CIGNA & Intracorp Rehab Management
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided September 15, 1997No. 1:97-cv-01564PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON REMOVAL and ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMAND
ALAN B. JOHNSON, Chief Judge.
The plaintiffs Objection to Notice of Removal and Motion for Remand, and the defendants’ response thereto, came before the Court for consideration. The Court, having reviewed the motion and response, the pleadings of record, the applicable law, and being fully advised in the premises, FINDS and ORDERS as follows:
1. Plaintiffs complaint was commenced in the District Court for the City and County of Denver, Case No. 97-CV-2205, on April 17, 1997. In her complaint, plaintiff asserts two claims for relief…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Billy Max Brown v. Demco, Inc. v. Employers Casualty Co., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Hewitt v. City of StantonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Cornwall v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stone v. Department of AviationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2003
- Cheney v. StudstrupDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1998
- Curtis v. Firstar Financial CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2024