Legal Opinion
Gavurnik v. Home Properties, L.P.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 3, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION No. 16-633PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Schiller, District Judge
59-year-old Bruce Gavurnik worked as a service technician for Home Properties, L.P. Gavurnik suffered from a variety of vascular and musculoskeletal conditions affecting his ability to walk and stand. He requested accommodations to wear special podiatric shoes and to work only 40 hours per week. Home Properties allowed Gavur-nik to wear special shoes, but required Gavurnik to work overtime as needed. Nine months later, Home Properties fired Gavurnik for job misconduct. Gavurnik sued Home Properties for discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Parrotta v. Peco Energy Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Meyer v. McDonaldDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- DINGER v. BRYN MAWR BANK CORPORATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- FISHER v. THE BOEING COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- GAVURNIK v. VANTAGE LABS, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.