Legal Opinion

Moore Ford Co. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 22, 1980No. 80-68PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John R. Elrod, Special Justice.

This is an action for misrepresentation.

In March, 1977, appellee purchased a new 1977 Mustang automobile from Moore Ford Company. She executed a conditional sales contract, assigned by Moore Ford Company to Ford Motor Credit Corporation, consistently made her monthly payments thereon, and drove the car for approximately sixteen months before she discovered that it had prior body work performed on the hood and one fender. Thereupon, she brought this cause of action, alleging that the car had been represented as a new car at the time of purchase when in fact it…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ray Dodge, Inc. v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. Satterfield v. Rebsamen Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. New Empire Ins. Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  4. DuFresne v. PaulSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  5. Harris v. ShawSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ellerin v. Fairfax SavingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Keck v. American Employment Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. L. L. Cole & Son, Inc. v. HickmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Interstate Freeway Services, Inc. v. HouserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Wallis v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API