Hamilton v. Consolidated Water Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
This suit involves the ownership to six and one-half inches of water measured under a four-inch pressure, to quiet title to which the action is brought. The water in question is produced from tunnels in section 3, township 1 south, range 8 west, S. B. M., which are on the property of the defendant. The plaintiffs also seek to enjoin the defendant from diminishing or interfering with the de livery of the six and one-half inches of water which the plaintiffs claim to own collectively. The defendant admits that the plaintiffs have an interest in said six and one-half inches of water, but claim…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frink v. RoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Stanley v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Williams v. HarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Harris v. BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Sharp v. BlankenshipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Caito v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Williams v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- First Federal Trust Co. v. StockflethCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Lomboy v. Wells Fargo Bank, National AssociationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Weil v. Raisin City Elementary School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021