Legal Opinion
Mayview Corp. v. Rodstein
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 19, 1973No. Nos. 71-2058, 71-2319PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge:
In No. 71-2058, appellants Mayview Corporation et al. (hereafter Mayview) contest a preliminary injunction granted *716by the district court to appellees Harvey B. Rodstein, et al. (hereafter Rodstein) on May 25, 1971. The injunction prohibited Mayview from infringing Rod-stein’s patent No. 3,563,134 and trademark “RODAC,” No. 903,459. The question is whether the trial court applied the proper standard for grant or refusal of a preliminary injunction. We reverse.
In No. 71-2319, Rodstein cross-appeals from alleged refusal of the district court to grant…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Mayo v. Lakeland Highlands Canning Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Smith International, Inc., a California Corporation v. Hughes Tool Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Litton Systems, Inc. v. Sundstrand Corporation, a Delaware Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Rohm & Haas Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
- SSP Agricultural Equipment, Inc. v. Orchard-Rite Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Jenn-Air Corporation v. Modern Maid CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.