State v. Gremillion

Appellant was convicted of the offense of having intoxicating liquor in his possession for beverage purposes in violation of Act 39 of 1921. He moved for a new trial, attaching to his motion a statement of facts, admitted by the district attorney to be the facts on which the conviction was founded. The facts so admitted are as follows:

“The defendant, Herman Gremillion, while attending a public dance in the village of .Echo, in the parish of Rapides, La., on the date alleged in the indictment (the 25th of April, 1925), took from- his pocket a pint bottle containing whisky, which he had…