Legal Opinion

Faustina v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 1959No. Civ. 24091PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEA, J. pro tem. *

Petitioner is charged with an attempt to receive stolen property. A motion to set aside the amended information having been denied, petitioner now seeks this writ under section 999a of the Penal Code.

The testimony taken at the preliminary hearing which is material to this decision may be summarized as follows:

Six automobile tires were stolen from a tire company on June 29, 1959, by Paul Woods and one Lewis. Within a few minutes after the theft they were arrested. The police took possession of the tires. Later that same day the tires were identified by employees of the tire…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. . GardnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. People v. . JaffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. People v. CamodecaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. People v. WernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. State of Oregon v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. VitaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. State v. NiehuserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. People v. MeyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. People v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API