State v. Niehuser
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
The issues here are: (1) In order to prove a charge of theft (by obtaining or receiving) is it essential to prove that the property received was, in fact, stolen; (2) if so, does property cease to be stolen when recovered by the police; and (3) if so, can the receipt of such previously stolen property constitute the crime of attempted theft.
The police captured two burglars, Gilcrease and McSorley, and recovered the fruits of their crimes including two television sets taken from one home and a rifle taken from another home. Gilcrease told the police that they had planned to sell these items to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. Amos BranchOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Booth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1964
- State v. ZadinaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
- State v. ZadinaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. Raymond Walter MonasterskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- State v. SpragginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. MurphyUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Bandy v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.