Legal Opinion
Amati v. City of Woodstock, Ill.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 10, 1993No. 92 C 20347PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
REINHARD, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On November 25, 1992, plaintiffs filed a 28-eount complaint against defendants, the City of Woodstock, Illinois (City), Herbert J. Pitzman, individually and as the Chief of Police of the City’s police department, and Randall Beu, a City police officer. Counts 1, 2, 11, 12, 21, 23 and 24 arise under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq., (Crime Control Act) and the court has jurisdiction over these counts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Counts 3, 4, 13, 14 and 25 arise under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Jodie S. Abbott, David M. Balmes, Deborah J. Combs v. Village of Winthrop HarborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Conner v. TateDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
- Tabor v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Debra Seitz v. City of Elgin, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.