Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Fenwrick

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided December 24, 2003No. Misc. Docket 2003-06Published

1ConcurrencePratt, Chief Judge

I concur but write separately to reiterate the importance of affording convening authorities the discretion properly granted to them by Article 25, UCMJ.

It should come as no surprise that, in applying the criteria enumerated in Article 25, UCMJ — age, education, training, experience, length of service, and judicial temperament — a convening authority will often look first to officers (and-enlisted members, when requested) who are senior in rank. See United States v. Upshaw, 49 M.J. 111 (C.A.A.F.1998) (citing United States v. Crawford, 35 C.M.R. 3, 12, 1964 WL 4914 (C.M.A.1964); United States…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. CrawfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  2. United States v. McClainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. GreeneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  4. United States v. DaigleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  5. United States v. UpshawCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API