Legal Opinion

Mutual Guarantee Building & Loan Ass'n v. Wilcox

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1922No. Appeal, No, 220PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No, 220, Jan. T., 1922, by plaintiff, from order of O. P. Lackawanna Co., March T., 1921, No. 714, dismissing proceedings for possession, in case of Mutual Guarantee Building & Loan Association v. Mary Wilcox. Petition by purchaser at sheriff’s sale to secure possession. Before Newcomb, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Petition dismissed. Plaintiff appealed. Error assigned, inter alia, was order, quoting it.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Defendant, Mary Wilcox, and her husband, Oliver Wilcox, were the owners of the premises situated at the northeast corner of West Parker Street and Amelia Aye*387nue, in the City of Scranton. On the 8th day of September, 1913, they conveyed the property to their son, Horace Wilcox, for the consideration of “one dollar and other good and valuable considerations” and on the 29th of September, 1913, the son, in writing, leased the property to his father and mother, “in consideration of natural love and affection and the further consideration of one dollar and the covenants in the case…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hulett v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Mitchell v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1848

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cancilla v. BondySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Miners Sav. Bk. of Pittston v. Tracy Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Heymann v. Fourth Dickerson Building Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API