Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Wilcox

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1913No. Nos. 10869, 10880PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeals from judgments of tbe superior court for Chehalis county, Irwin, J., entered August 6, 1912, dismissing actions consolidated for trial, to recover personal property or its price.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

These two actions were begun independently by the petitioners against the receiver of the Syverson Lumber & Shingle Company, an insolvent corporation, to obtain possession of certain machinery, or to have the contract price of the machinery adjudged a preferred claim against the insolvent estate. The actions were consolidated for trial. The trial court denied the prayers of the petitions, and these appeals followed.

Both cases are based upon the same facts. There is no substantial dispute upon the facts. It appears that, in the year 1911, appellants, under separate conditional sales contracts,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cohn v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Union Steamboat Co. v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Creditors v. Consumer's Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Randle v. Winona Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co. v. WillsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
  3. Jennings v. SchwartzWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Malmo v. Washington Rendering & Fertilizing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Bacon v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1923

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API