Legal Opinion

Pardo v. Tanning Research Laboratories, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided March 10, 1998No. 96-19-CIV-ORL-3ABF(22)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BAKER, United States Magistrate Judge.

This cause comes before the Court for consideration of the motion by Defendant, Tanning Research Laboratories, Inc. (herein “TRL”) for summary judgment. The Court1 has reviewed the briefs and record, and the extensive evidence2 submitted by the parties (Doe. Nos. 88-103, 107, 112-120, 122, and 123). For the reasons set forth herein, the motion is GRANTED.

Factual Background

Plaintiffs Guillermo Pardo, Nicolas Winegardner, and their company Boston Do Brasil, Ltd. (herein “Boston”), have sued TRL for alleged fraud and negligent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Louis F. Cavic and Helen A. Cavic, His Wife, Cross-Appellants v. The Grand Bahama Development Company, Limited, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Cripe v. ATLANTIC FIRST NAT. BANK, ETC.Supreme Court of Florida · 1982
  5. Spence, Payne, Masington v. Philip M. GersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Belik v. Carlson Travel Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
  2. Kadylak v. Royal Caribbean Cruise, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API