Legal Opinion

Spiker v. City of Ottumwa

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 7, 1922PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from Wapello District Court.-t-Francis M. Hunter, Judge. Action at law, to recover damages for personal injury. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

— The following facts are either admitted or have support in the evidence. Willard Street, in the city of Ottumwa, extends north and south. It is a well improved and much frequented street, lined on either side by residence property. On the east-side of Willard Street was the residence of one Buxnaugh. On or about November 1, 1918, Burnaugh, desiring to make connection between his house and the water main *845in. Willard Street, applied to the proper city officer, and obtained a permit authorizing him to open up the street for that purpose. The work was begun in the morning or forenoon of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. WoodburySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Sutton v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Downing v. Merchants National Bank of GreeneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. Owens v. Iowa CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  5. Kendall v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Lasell v. Tri-States Theatre Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  2. Hanson v. ManningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. Figge Auto Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  4. Peckinpaugh v. EngelkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. Stanford v. City of OntarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API