Legal Opinion
D. R. C. v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided June 11, 1982No. 4905PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SINGLETON, Judge.
D.R.C. appeals from a determination that he is a delinquent minor1 based upon a jury finding that he had committed petty larceny.2
On appeal D.R.C. alleges that evidence which was seized in violation of the state3 and federal constitutions4 was introduced against him at the delinquency proceeding. The following facts establish the context in which the search and seizure occurred.
Norman Hiler, Walter Krieger and D.R.C. are students at Kenai Central High School. On February 19, 1979, Hiler and Krieger attended second-period gym classes. Hiler was in a class instructed by…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Willoya v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- State in Interest of TLOSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Lowry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- State v. EngerudSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.