State in Interest of TLO
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
94 N.J. 331 (1983)
463 A.2d 934
STATE IN THE INTEREST OF T.L.O., JUVENILE-APPELLANT.
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JEFFREY ENGERUD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued May 10, 1983.
Decided August 8, 1983.
Lois DeJulio, First Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant T.L.O. (Joseph H. Rodriguez, Public Defender, attorney).
Randolph A. Newman, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appellant Jeffrey Engerud (Joseph H. Rodriguez, Public Defender, attorney).
Victoria Curtis Bramson, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- David Tarter v. William RaybuckCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- People v. William G.California Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. Michael G.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Gordon J. v. Santa Ana Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- State v. AlexanderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.