Legal Opinion

Tarbox v. Blaisdell

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 15, 2009No. Docket: Yor-09-173PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

[¶ 1] Stephen W. Blaisdell, Susan M. Blaisdell, Sarah Blaisdell (the Blaisdell heirs) and HDV Enterprises, LLC appeal from a summary judgment in favor of Robert J. Tarbox, Corry A. Tarbox, Catherine M. Tarbox, and Philip J. Tarbox entered in the Superior Court (York County, Fritz-sche, J.) on the Tarboxes’ complaint seeking a declaratory judgment that they are the fee owners of a strip of property abut ting their lot. The Blaisdell heirs and HDV argue that the court improperly applied 33 M.R.S. § 469-A (2008) in finding in the Tarboxes’ favor, and in determining the portion of the abutting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cookson v. Brewer School DepartmentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  2. River Dale Ass'n v. BlossSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  3. Lamson v. CoteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  4. Fournier v. ElliottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of Fortier v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  2. Tarason v. Wesson Realty, LLC.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  3. Estate of Fortier v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  4. Tarason v. Wesson Realty, LLC.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API