Legal Opinion

Lamson v. Cote

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 18, 2001PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, J.

[¶ 1] Mark and Marie Cote appeal from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Oxford County, Fritzsche, J.) declaring that Barbara Lamson owns to the center line of the “road” adjacent to her property and that the Cotes have no right to use the road. We vacate the judgment in part and affirm in part.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] The matter before us relates to a dispute over access to Howard Pond in Hanover. Barbara Lamson owns waterfront property that abuts a strip of land leading from a perimeter road to the pond. She sought a declaratory judgment that she had become the owner of part of that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glidden v. BeldenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. Franklin Property Trust v. Foresite, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Dowley v. MorencySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  4. Gatchell v. GatchellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928
  5. Johnson v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Portland Water District v. Town of StandishSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  2. Flaherty v. MutherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  3. Hartwell v. StanleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  4. Bruce Tisdale v. Thelma G. BuchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  5. Tarbox v. BlaisdellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API