Legal Opinion

Ziegelheim v. Flohr

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 19, 1954No. 12880PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INCH, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff sues for infringement of a copyrighted Hebrew prayer book printed and published by him in 1943, and for unfair competition.

The defendants’ answer denied material allegations of the complaint and set up nine separate defenses which may be stated as follows: 'That plaintiff’s book was not copyrightable; that it was not original with plaintiff and did not contain any original plan or arrangement; that plaintiff had made piratical use of other books and, therefore, did not obtain a valid copyright and was himself guilty of inequitable conduct; that plaintiff had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Alfred Bell & Co. Ltd. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  3. Washingtonian Publishing Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. Jerry Vogel Music Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  5. Wrench v. Universal Pictures Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Stone v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  3. Stone v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. Greenbie v. NobleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  5. Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc., and Henry Glass & Co. v. Jobela Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API