Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Johnson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1918PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the District Court of Oliver County, North Dakota, Honorable J. M. Hanley, Judge. “The register of deeds may in all cases require the party for whom any services are to be rendered to pay the fees in advance.” Comp. Laws 1913, § 2212, as amended. A law established for a public reason cannot be contravened by a private agreement. Comp.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court of Oliver County, North Dakota, Honorable J. M. Hanley, Judge. “The register of deeds may in all cases require the party for whom any services are to be rendered to pay the fees in advance.” Comp. Laws 1913, § 2212, as amended. A law established for a public reason cannot be contravened by a private agreement. Comp. Laws 1913, § 7247; Parrish v. Mahany, 73 N. W. 97. Where an instrument comes into the hands of the register of deeds, and the fees for recording same were not paid in advance, such delivery to the register of deeds does not have the effect of…

1Opinion of the CourtGrace, J.

Appeal from the district court of Oliver county, North Dakota, Honorable J. M. Hanley, Judge.

This action is brought upon a promissory note, dated November 26, 1912, for $3,100, with interest after date at the rate of 8 per cent per annum, and for the foreclosure of a real estate mortgage securing said note and bearing even date with said note, a lien against the N.| of section 11, township 142, range 87, Oliver county, North Dakota. The note and mortgage were each executed and delivered by M. J. J ohnson and Clara J ohnson, who were then the owners of the land in question. *434to the First…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Horton v. Wright, Barrett, & Stillwell Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Traill County v. MoackrudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API