Horton v. Wright, Barrett, & Stillwell Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, G. M. Cooley, Special Judge. “Where a person, by reason of actual notice of a given fact, is sought to be charged with notice of other facts which inquiry would disclose, there must appear in the nature of the case such a connection between the known fact and the fact with notice of which he is sought to be charged, that the former may be said to furnish a reasonable and actual clue to the latter*.” Johnson v. Erlandson, 14 N.…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, G. M. Cooley, Special Judge. “Where a person, by reason of actual notice of a given fact, is sought to be charged with notice of other facts which inquiry would disclose, there must appear in the nature of the case such a connection between the known fact and the fact with notice of which he is sought to be charged, that the former may be said to furnish a reasonable and actual clue to the latter*.” Johnson v. Erlandson, 14 N. D. 518, 105 N. W. 722. There was a good, valid consideration for the new notes and chattel mortgage, and this question…
1Opinion of the CourtGrace, J.
This is an appeal from, an order of the district Gourt of Ward county from a judgment and an order of said court overruling-the motion for judgment and a new trial.
The complaint in the case is one for conversion of a certain frame1 building located on lots 5 and 6 of block 30 of the first addition to the1 city of Minot, on the right of way of the Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Company, the value of which building is stipulated to be $1,200. The complaint is in proper form, and among other things a proper demand is set out. The answer is a general denial, with the exception…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Thompson v. . Van VechtenNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- People's Savings Bank v. BatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Gilchrist v. GoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Constant v. . University of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Craft v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commercial Credit Corporation v. DassenkoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Cambridge Production Credit Ass'n v. PatrickOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Haas Baruch & Co. v. Grooms Sanitary StoreNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
- Hanson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
- Commercial Credit Corporation v. DassenkoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950