Legal Opinion

Brauns v. Housden

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1938No. 26939. Department TwoPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

This controversy is an offshoot of an action brought by Daisy Brauns, as administratrix of the estate of August E. Brauns (Brauns v. Housden, 186 Wash. 149, 56 P. (2d) 1313), and is wholly con cerned with the division of fees among the attorneys who acted for plaintiff in that action.

August E. Brauns was killed in an automobile accident November 9, 1934. His widow, Mrs. Daisy Brauns, employed Alfred Gfeller, who had acted as attorney for the deceased for a number of years, to probate the estate and to bring a wrongful death action. Mr. Gfeller, who had become quite deaf and had not engaged in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Showalter v. SpangleWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Underwood v. OverstreetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Langdon v. KennedyNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Clark v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  5. Bailey v. GriggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McCann v. ToddSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  2. In Re JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Swanson v. Webb Tractor & Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. CARSON Admx. v. McMAHAN AdmrOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Federated American InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API