Legal Opinion

Heraeus Amersil, Inc. v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 26, 1987No. Appeal 86-1526PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents the question whether the Court of International Trade correctly held that Heraeus Amersil’s (Heraeus) imported “bell jars” were properly classified by Customs under item 548.05 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) as “Articles not specially provided for, of glass: Other” or should be classified, as urged by Heraeus below and on appeal, under item 548.01 TSUS as “Tubes and tubing with ends processed: Containing over 95 percent silica by weight____” We affirm.

The parties stipulated that these articles are invoiced as “Rotosil tubes” with…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heraeus-Amersil, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API