Legal Opinion
Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy District
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 4, 1969No. 42527Published
1Opinion of the Court
464 P.2d 748 (1968)
OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD, Plaintiff in Error, and
The City of Oklahoma City, a municipal corporation, Intervenor,
v.
CENTRAL OKLAHOMA MASTER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT, Defendant in Error.
No. 42527.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
May 14, 1968.
Supplemental Opinion on Rehearing March 4, 1969.
G.T. Blankenship, Atty. Gen. of Oklahoma, Brian H. Upp, Asst. Atty. Gen., Roy H. Semtner, Municipal Counselor, Robert H. Anderson, Asst. Municipal Counselor, for plaintiff in error and intervenor.
Sam F. Whitlock, Norman, for defendant in error.
Frank Carter, by Charles G. Huddleston, Enid, Otjen,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Miller v. LetzerichTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Hoefs v. ShortTexas Supreme Court · 1925
- State Ex Rel. State Game Commission v. Red River Valley Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. GrovesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.