Commonwealth v. Klaric
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
Appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his PCHA petition following a hearing. He alleges (1) that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to suppress identification testimony given by three Commonwealth witnesses; and (2) that his conviction for aggravated assault and battery 1 had merged in the conviction for rob bery by violence, 2 and the two convictions, even though petitioner had been sentenced on the robbery conviction alone, constituted a violation of the double jeopardy provisions of the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. TriplettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. HarperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. McCaskillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. CanadySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.