Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Klaric

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 15, 1979No. 253PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his PCHA petition following a hearing. He alleges (1) that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to suppress identification testimony given by three Commonwealth witnesses; and (2) that his conviction for aggravated assault and battery 1 had merged in the conviction for rob bery by violence, 2 and the two convictions, even though petitioner had been sentenced on the robbery conviction alone, constituted a violation of the double jeopardy provisions of the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. TriplettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. HarperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. McCaskillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. CanadySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API