Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McCaskill

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1983No. 355PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This appeal is from an order denying a petition filed under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act, 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541-9551. Appellant argues that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to call three alibi witnesses, and that he should therefore be granted a new trial. We have concluded: that counsel reasonably believed that one of the witnesses was dead; that the record is unclear whether the testimony of another of the witnesses would have helped appellant; but that appellant did show that the testimony of the remaining witness would have helped him. Since we can find no…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. DancerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. OwensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Sprangle v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Summerville v. WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. NockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. GaerttnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API