Legal Opinion
Jacques v. Kinsey
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 5, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
788 A.2d 932 (2001)
347 N.J. Super. 112
Edner JACQUES, Plaintiff,
v.
Hilda KINSEY, Defendant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided October 5, 2001.
Thomas Ryan for plaintiff (Lutz, Shafranski, Gorman and Mahoney, attorneys).
Robert C. Kane, Jr. for defendant (Maloof, Lebowitz, Connahan and Oleske, attorneys).
CHAMBERS, P.J.C.
In this motor vehicle accident case, defendant has moved for summary judgment contending that plaintiff has failed to meet the verbal threshold under the new Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8 (hereinafter AICRA). Plaintiff claims that his neck…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Oswin v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Polk v. DaconceicaoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Whitaker v. DeVillaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Phillips v. PhillipsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Caviglia v. Royal Tours of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Branca v. MatthewsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- SAMANTHA WHITE VS. PEGGY RAMIREZ SAMANTHA WHITE VS. RICARDO A. OCAMPO (L-3947-16 AND L-1959-17, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019