Christopher v. Porter
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
Terry and Ed Christopher (landlords) appeal from a judgment of the county court denying their petition for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3. Two of the respondents, Kenneth Porter and Janice Sullivan (tenants), have moved to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that the landlords had adequate alternative remedies and that the appeal is untimely. They also request that we impose sanctions pursuant to Mass. R. A. P. 25, as appearing in 376 Mass. 949 (1979). While we do not agree that the appeal is untimely or that sanctions are warranted in these circumstances, we agree with the tenants that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Operation RescueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Symmons v. O'KeeffeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Avery v. SteeleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- McGuinness v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Daum v. Delta Airlines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- D.R. Peck Excavating, Inc. v. MachadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Albert v. HowardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Davagian v. PappasMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014