Legal Opinion

Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Sussman

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 8, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complainant, by its bill, prays that a policy of accident insurance issued by it to the defendant be surrendered up and canceled, because, as alleged, it was obtained by fraud. Inherently, equity has jurisdiction over all cases of fraud. Eggers v. Anderson, 63 N.J. Eq. 264; CommercialCasualty Insurance Co. v. Southern Surety Co., 100 N.J. Eq. 92;affirmed, 101 N.J. Eq. 738. It appears that the defendant instituted an action at law against the complainant in the Hudson county circuit court, and the complainant effected the removal thereof to the United States district court, in which latter…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Eggers v. AndersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  2. Commercial, C., Co. v. Southern Surety Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  3. New York Life Ins. Co. v. SteinmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  4. Eibel v. Von FellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1897
  5. Polhemus v. Holland Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Prudential Ins. Co. v. Merritt-ChapmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. SternNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
  3. Crandol v. GarrisonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  4. Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life Ins.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
  5. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. AlvarezNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API