Polhemus v. Holland Trust Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Reed, whose opinion is reported in 1J/. Dick. Gh. Rep. 98.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Collins, J.
The elements of this controversy are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the learned vice-chancellor. We have not found it *655needful to determine whether or not the business transacted with the complainant in this state was authorized by the defendant, because we think that if it was not, the court of chancery, for reasons to be hereinafter stated, had, nevertheless, jurisdiction over the defendant. As to the principal claim for relief made by the complainant, we agree with the vice-chancellor in holding that the defendant had no trust for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Livingston's v. StorySupreme Court of the United States · 1837
3Cited by12 opinions
- Reeves v. ReevesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
- Conover v. Guarantee Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. MandelNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. SussmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
- Field v. FieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.