Mente & Co. v. Anciens Etablissements Verdier-Dufour & Cie
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ST. PAUL, Justice.
In December, 1925, and afterwards, defendant sold to plaintiff certain Australian wool pouches for the agreed price of $31,-670.26, on which plaintiff paid $29,603.73, leaving a balance due on said purchase of $2,066.53, which balance has never been paid, but is not disputed. It does not appear why said balance was not paid, but presumably it was because of the differences which arose between the parties over their next transactions, which is as follows:
In May, 1916, and afterwards, defendant ■ sold to plaintiff 245 long tons of old sound bagging for the agreed price of…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. CammarataDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Coppedge v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Salassi v. SalassiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Crichton v. Succession of CrichtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Dupre v. FloydLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.