Legal Opinion

Crichton v. Succession of Crichton

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 6, 1970No. 11316PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

232 So.2d 109 (1970)

Mrs. Martha Bailey CRICHTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SUCCESSION of Powell CRICHTON (Miss Margaret S. Hemingway, Ancillary Testamentary Executrix), Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11316.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

January 6, 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 3, 1970.

Theus, Grisham, Davis, Leigh & Brown, by John C. Theus and Robert L. Curry, Monroe, for Mrs. Martha Bailey Crichton.

Hayes, Harkey & Smith, by Thos. M. Hayes, Jr., Monroe, for Miss Margaret S. Hemingway.

Blanchard, Walker, O'Quin & Roberts, by Robert Roberts, III and Joseph W. Milner, Shreveport, for Gloria…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cobb Industries, Inc. v. HightLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Swain v. SwainLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Sandifer v. SandiferLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Iona Sutton Lane-Burslem v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Iona Sutton Lane-BurslemCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  5. Cook v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API