Jock Orville Autio v. State of Minnesota
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
The State of Minnesota appeals the district court’s denial of its motion to dismiss Jock Orville Autio’s claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and other supplemental state law claims. Minnesota contends that Autio’s claims should have been dismissed because the district court lacked jurisdiction. Specifically, Minnesota argues that the Eleventh Amendment acts as a bar to an ADA claim against a state in federal court. We conclude that the state was properly sued in federal court and affirm the district court.
I
Plaintiff/appellee, Autio, worked as a store…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Torres v. Puerto Rico Tourism Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Nelson v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Iris I. Varner, and United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. Illinois State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- John Humenansky v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Schall v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.