Legal Opinion
PNC Bank, N.A. v. Yen
Fairfax County Circuit Court
Decided February 26, 2016No. Case Nos. CL-2015-16699, CL-2015-16700, CL-2015-16701, CL-2015-16702, CL-2015-16915Published
1Opinion of the Court
By
Judge Daniel E. Ortiz
These cases are before the Court on Defendant Amber Yen’s (“Ms. Yen”) Motion To Quash Garnishment Summons in five separate proceedings. Case Nos. CL-2015-16699, CL-2015-16700, CL-2015-16701, CL-2015-16702, CL-2015-16915. For the purposes of this Letter, Ms. Yen’s five motions to quash garnishment summonses are referred to collectively as the “Motions To Quash.” Plaintiff PNC Bank, National Association (“PNC”), served the garnishment summonses on various entities in its effort to satisfy a personal judgment entered in favor of PNC against Ms. Yen. After oral argument by…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Redding & Company, Inc. v. Russwine Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Wells v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966
- In Re AH Robins Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1986
- Douglas Dees v. Helmuth T. Billy, M.D. Gregory E. Ginn, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.