Campan v. Molle
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Walter Van Dyke, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
On July 11, 1896, the defendant, J. M. Molle, held an agreement for the purchase of a parcel of land from the owner thereof for the sum of three hundred and fifty dollars, and at his request plaintiff on that date loaned to the defendants the said sum of money, for which they executed to him their promissory note, and afterward applied the money in pa3rment of the balance due on the agreement, and obtained the legal title to the land. The plaintiff alleges, “upon information and beliefj” that the defendants promised him that if he would advance the said money they would secure him in its…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mascarel v. RaffourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- Ould v. StoddardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by6 opinions
- Salter v. UlrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Carter v. Tanners Leather Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Coburn v. CoburnMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Kirkpatrick v. Westamerica BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Kleinsorge v. KleinsorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.