Legal Opinion

Cecil v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 3, 2003No. A03A1596PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Vincent Cecil guilty of armed robbery, aggravated assault, possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, and theft by taking. Cecil appeals, alleging the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions for armed robbery and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. He also alleges the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict on the aggravated assault count. We find no error and affirm Cecil’s convictions.

1. Viewed in a light most favorable to support the jury’s verdict, the evidence shows that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ivey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Singleton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Gee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Ball v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Handford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blocker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  2. Harp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  4. Duandre Jamar Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. KASHAMBA v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API