Handford v. State

Eldridge, Judge.

Defendant Alden Handford challenges his June 1998 conviction for selling cocaine in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act, OCGA § 16-13-20 et seq. We affirm.

Handford’s sole enumeration of error contends that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s guilty verdict. In reviewing the record on appeal,

the evidence must be viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict, and appellant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence; moreover, on appeal this court determines evidence sufficiency, and does not weigh the evidence or determine…