Rappich v. Altermatt

OPINION

By MILLER, J.

This is a law appeal from a judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ cause of action after sustaining the demurrer to the amended petition. Since the question presented involves the sufficiency of the allegations contained therein, we quote it in its entirety:

“Plaintiffs say that on July 22, 1949, they purchased from the defendants parts of Lots Nos. 139 and 140 of Berwick Addition to the City of Columbus, on which the defendants, on or about said date, had completed a single family dwelling, the said defendant, Albert B. Altermatt being the general contractor and builder of…