Chapman v. Orrachio
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHornbeck, J.
It does not seen to us that it is necessary to cite extended authority to establish that every misrepresentation heretofore mentioned related to" a material fact which affected the value of the farm in a marked degree. It is an inevitable conclusion that such representations would operate to cause the plaintiff to conclude that the land for which he was about to trade was of considerable value, whereas in fact it was practically worthless.
^Representations as to the correct condition or quality of land are representations of material facts.”
Woodward v. Western Canada Colonization Co. (Minn.)…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Rappich v. AltermattOhio Court of Appeals · 1957