Legal Opinion
Beamer v. Feick
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 24, 1960No. 733PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFess, J.
This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Sandusky Municipal Court on behalf of plaintiffs in the sum of $168.28.
In their original petition, plaintiffs alleged that pursuant to contract, defendant had agreed to pay all assessments for and provide for storm sewer and storm sewer system which was breached by defendant, requiring plaintiffs to pay $132.51 together with penalties and interest accruing June 23, 1958, for which judgment was prayed.
Several months later plaintiff filed an amended petition alleging:
“That by virtue of a contract entered into between themselves and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- First Discount Corp. v. DakenOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
- Green Bay Auto Distributors, Inc. v. Willys-Overland Motors, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1951
- Rappich v. AltermattOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
- Isaac v. American Surety Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1939
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nickels v. Koehler Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Dunn Appraisal Company v. Honeywell Information Systems Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Middletown City Employees Federal Credit Union, Inc. v. Shepherd (In Re Shepherd)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
- Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,307, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,719 Charles Nickels, Margaret Nickels, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Shareholders of Koehler Management Corporation v. Koehler Management Corp., Rhoda v. McIntyre Individually and as a Representative of a Class,plaintiff-Appellee v. The First National Bank of Cincinnati, Individually and as Agent,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976