American Motorists Insurance v. Vermont
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff contends that the phrase “articles carried or held as samples or for sale” means “property owned or used by the insured of a commercial nature in the conduct of his trade, occupation, or business.” We reject this construction.
While it is the general rule that ambiguities in an insurance contract must be construed most favorably to the insured, this rule has no application when the contract is unambiguous. Hulsey v. Interstate Life &c. Ins. Co., 207 Ga. 167, 169 (60 SE2d 353). Where the terms of an insurance policy are plain and unambiguous, the courts have no…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hulsey v. Interstate Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Golden v. National Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. KellarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Fokes v. Interstate Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Southern Indemnity Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Last v. West American Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Jones v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Doerpinghaus v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. N. A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co v. QuirtCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.