Legal Opinion
United States v. Kiger
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 13, 1969No. 66 Cr. 452PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge:
Defendant Peter Niven Kiger was tried before me without a jury on an indictment charging >. him with knowingly destroying and multilating his Selective Service Notice of Classification certificate in violation of § 462(b) (3) of the Universal Military Training and Service Act of 1948, as amended, 50 App.U.S.C. § 462(b) (3). At the conclusion of the trial, decision was reserved. This section of the Universal Military Training and Service Act of 1948, as amended in 1965, provides that a crime is committed by “any person * * * who forges, alters,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Raley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. David J. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- White House Vigil for the Era Committee v. William P. Clark, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Commonwealth v. GeogheganMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- United States v. KigerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Graham v. PrinceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- United States v. Peter Niven KigerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.