United States v. Kiger
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
We affirm the conviction below on the opinion below, reported in 297 F.Supp. 339 (SDNY1969) and do so upon the authority binding upon this court, United States v. O’Brien, 391 U.S. 367, 88 S.Ct. 1673, 20 L.Ed.2d 672 (1968). And see United States v. Miller, 367 F.2d 72 (2 Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 911, 87 S.Ct. 855, 17 L.Ed.2d 787 (1967), rehearing denied, 392 U.S. 917, 88 S.Ct. 2049, 20 L.Ed.2d 1378 (1968). With reference to the claim that the judge below abused his discretion in declining to accept the proffered offer of a plea of nalo contendere, we discover no reason to interfere…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. David J. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. KigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Peter Niven KigerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970