Legal Opinion

Gibbons v. Hansch

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 5, 1932No. 28,743PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Defendants appeal from the order denying their motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff’s right to recover on the promissory note sued on is conceded. Defendants set up a counterclaim, which was dismissed without prejudice; and the refusal of the court to receive evidence as to this counterclaim, after the introduction of a written contract whereby plaintiff sold her one-third interest in a partnership operating a laundry, raises the only question upon this appeal.

By the contract plaintiff sold to the two individual defendants all her right, title, and interest in the laundry and dry cleaning…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Von Bremen v. . MacMonniesNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Williams v. FarrandMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Foss v. RobyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Fish Bros. Wagon v. La Belle Wagon WorksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Marshall Engine Co. v. New Marshall Engine Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Yoo Hoo of Florida Corp. v. CatroneoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  3. Waterman v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Huston v. DicksonOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Warp v. WarpAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API