Legal Opinion
Yoo Hoo of Florida Corp. v. Catroneo
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 18, 1965No. 64-880PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWANN, Judge.
Appellant filed a complaint seeking, inter alia, an injunction against appellees. Ap-pellees filed a Motion to Dismiss on the grounds that the complaint failed to state a cause of action. The trial court granted the Motion to Dismiss, with prejudice. This appeal followed. The parties will be referred to herein as in the trial court.
The complaint, filed May 15, 1964, alleged generally that Steve and Lucy Catroneo owned and operated a business in Dade County, Florida, which distributed a non-carbonated beverage known as “Yoo Hoo” and that the Catroneos sold the business, including…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Renpak, Inc. v. OppenheimerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Haut v. RossbachNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
- Simms v. BurnetteSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Reliance Insurance Company v. BrickenkampDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- J. Alfred Mouton, Inc. v. HebertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Juan A. Marrero and Maria Marrero v. City of Hialeah, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Bond v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Templeton v. Creative Loafing Tampa, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Bloom v. K & K Pipe & Supply Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- City Gas Co. v. BrennerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969