Legal Opinion

Fish Bros. Wagon v. La Belle Wagon Works

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1892PublishedCited by 28 opinions

' APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Douglas County. In 1863 the defendant Titus G. Fish and one Bull, under the firm name of Fish & Bull, commenced the business of manufacturing wagons in the city of "Racine.

Read the full summary

' APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Douglas County. In 1863 the defendant Titus G. Fish and one Bull, under the firm name of Fish & Bull, commenced the business of manufacturing wagons in the city of "Racine. As such firm, they employed one Edwin B. Fish, a brother of Titus G. About 1864 Bull went out of the firm, and Abner 0. Fish, a brother of Titus G., became a member thereof, and they continued the business of manufacturing wagons under the firm name of Fish Bros., and as such continued Ed/win B. Fish as an employee. About 1868 Edwin B. Fish became a member of the firm of Fish Bros. About…

1Opinion of the CourtCassodat, J.

The plaintiff, Fish Bros. Wagon Company, was incorporated in January, 1887, and since that time has been engaged in the manufacture of wagons at Eacine, and selling the same throughout the country. The defendant La Belle Wagon Worhs and the other defendants have since June 17, 1890, been engaged in the manufacture of wagons at South Superior, and selling the same in different parts of the country. This suit was commenced in July last to restrain the defendants from using the words “ Fish Bros.,” “ Fish Bros. & Co.,” “ Fish Bros. Wagons,” and the picture of a fish as trade-marks on the wagons…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Brown Chemical Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Tennessee Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Hoxie v. ChaneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  5. Zucker v. KarpelesMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States Ozone Co. v. United States Ozone Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  2. Plough, Inc. v. Kreis Laboratories, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  3. Bissell Chilled Plow Works v. T. M. Bissell Plow Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1902
  4. Allegretti v. Allegretti Chocolate Cream Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Rowell v. RowellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API