Legal Opinion

Franke v. N. W. Taussig Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1905PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to compel election.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The defendant moves to compel the plaintiffs to elect between the three causes of action set forth in the complaint, and to state upon which one they will rely. The first cause of action alleges, in substance, the sale and delivery under an express contract of 16,019 bags of sugar at an agreed price of $202,922.01, on which there is claimed a balance due of $11,307.59. The second cause of action alleges the sale and delivery of the same quantity of sugar of the same value, alleging such value, however, as the reasonable worth, instead of the agreed price, and claiming a balance due of exactly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murray v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Mayo v. . KnowltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Velie v. Newark City InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Seymour v. WarrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Leslie v. Firemen's Insurance of NewarkNew York Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API