Legal Opinion

Velie v. Newark City Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1883PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Motion, by defendant to compel the plaintiff to elect between two separate statements of a single cause of action, and also to state the interest of the defendant Thompson in the insured property with- more certainty and definiteness in the Gomplaint..

1Opinion of the CourtWestbrook, J.

— The plaintiff John W. Yelie, as theassignee of Giles W. Cowley, seeks to recover of the defendant, The Newark City Insurance Company, the sum of $1,250,. with interest from January 4, 1882; that being a portion of,' the loss which Cowley is alleged to' have sustained in- the; *2destruction by fire of certain property of which he was then the owner.

The-complaint states separately two grounds or reasons for the liability of the Insurance Company: First. That such defendant, in consideration of twenty-five dollars paid to it by said Cowley, issued to him its policy of insurance by which it…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Logan v. WhitleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Purcell v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Seymour v. WarrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Franke v. N. W. Taussig Co.New York Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Schuyler v. PeckCity of New York Municipal Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API