Legal Opinion
Ray v. City of Maple Grove
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 19, 1994No. C8-94-287PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
The district court confirmed an underin-sured motorist arbitration award for appellant, interpreting the award to be in the amount of $25,152.94, which represents $90,-152.94 in damages found by the arbitrators, less payments that the underinsured driver’s insurer made separately to appellant and to a subrogated workers’ compensation carrier. Appellant argues that the arbitrators intended the total damages to be offset only by the amount received by him — exclusive of what the workers’ compensation carrier received. We agree and reverse.
FACTS
Appellant Jeffrey Ray was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Grudem Brothers Co. v. Great Western Piping Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Kersting v. Royal-Milbank InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- San Francisco Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 6Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Beukhof v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. CasperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Rasmussen v. SauerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Ray v. City of Maple GroveCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corporation, Sining MaoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016