Legal Opinion

Bales v. Brown

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1877PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Erom the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

rNotice and motion to correct a record by a nunc fro tunc entry, brought after the term at which the record was made had expired.

The notice states, that the court, at a previous term, *283had rendered judgment in the case against J ackson Bales, Stephen Bales and Thomas I. Earr, hut, by a misprision of the clerk, the judgment was entered against J ackson Bales alone; that afterward Thomas McGrinnis entered himself as replevin bail upon the judgment, as rendered, against all the defendants, and moved the court to correct the record hy a nunc pro tunc entry, so as to show that the judgment was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fite v. DoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1821
  2. Makepeace v. LukensIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  3. King v. AnthonyIndiana Supreme Court · 1828
  4. M'Manus v. RichardsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  5. Smith v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1839

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Miller v. RoyceIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Harris v. TomlinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Reily v. BurtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Gray v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API