Bales v. Brown
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Monroe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.
rNotice and motion to correct a record by a nunc fro tunc entry, brought after the term at which the record was made had expired.
The notice states, that the court, at a previous term, *283had rendered judgment in the case against J ackson Bales, Stephen Bales and Thomas I. Earr, hut, by a misprision of the clerk, the judgment was entered against J ackson Bales alone; that afterward Thomas McGrinnis entered himself as replevin bail upon the judgment, as rendered, against all the defendants, and moved the court to correct the record hy a nunc pro tunc entry, so as to show that the judgment was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fite v. DoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1821
- Makepeace v. LukensIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- King v. AnthonyIndiana Supreme Court · 1828
- M'Manus v. RichardsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
- Smith v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Miller v. RoyceIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Harris v. TomlinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Reily v. BurtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Gray v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.